Skip to content

Article: French scientists crack secrets of Mona Lisa

San Francisco Chronicle:  Full article here
ANGELA DOLAND, Associated Press, 07/16/10

The enigmatic smile remains a mystery, but French scientists say they have cracked a few secrets of the “Mona Lisa.” French researchers studied seven of the Louvre Museum’s Leonardo da Vinci paintings, including the “Mona Lisa,” to analyze the master’s use of successive ultrathin layers of paint and glaze – a technique that gave his works their dreamy quality.

Specialists from the Center for Research and Restoration of the Museums of France found that da Vinci painted up to 30 layers of paint on his works to meet his standards of subtlety. Added up, all the layers are less than 40 micrometers, or about half the thickness of a human hair, researcher Philippe Walter said Friday.

The technique, called “sfumato,” allowed da Vinci to give outlines and contours a hazy quality and create an illusion of depth and shadow. His use of the technique is well-known, but scientific study on it has been limited because tests often required samples from the paintings.

Old Masters and Modern Science

I do not post as much as I would like to these days, but do feel compelled to note this recent review by Michael Kimmelman in today’s New York Times, titled Old Masters and Modern Science.  It looks at an exhibition at the National Gallery in London about the chemistry of painting.  According to Kimmelman, “Out to instruct us in the chemistry of painting, [this exhibition] ends up suggesting how elusive art remains despite all the gadgets that we devise to master it, see http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/arts/design/13abroad.html

Below is the beginning of the review:

LONDON — At first blush “Close Examination: Fakes, Mistakes and Discoveries,” here at the National Gallery, has the quaint, cheerfully scholastic earnestness of a science fair. Some 30 pictures from the permanent collection, most of them culled from storage, have been enlisted to anchor a flurry of wall texts, X-rays and the sort of enlarged microscopic cross sections of layered pigments and varnish vaguely resembling the cautionary photographs of plaque that elementary school teachers flourish before floss-wary fourth grader

A celebratory primer on polarized light microscopy and other cumbersomely termed diagnostic tools employed by conservators today to determine when and how a picture was made, the show may sound like homework.

But it isn’t; far from it. It’s one of those gems, which, amid the hard science, stumbles onto squishier truths about what we are really looking for when we look at art. Out to instruct us in the chemistry of painting, it ends up suggesting how elusive art remains despite all the gadgets that we devise to master it.

Continues at
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/arts/design/13abroad.html

Open Call: DIGITAL’2010: PLANET EARTH

DIGITAL’2010:  PLANET EARTH
12th international digital print competition-exhibition
organized by Art & Science Collaborations, Inc. (ASCI)
to be held at the New York Hall of Science
Oct.3, 2010 – January 31, 2011
DEADLINE: Aug.16, 2010
Click here for the GUIDELINES <http://www.asci.org/artikel1106.html> with links to:
Co-Juror Bios, Online Entry Form, Payment Page]

INTRODUCTION
Our blue planet, spinning like a jewel in our solar system, has been perceptually defined by the technology of each era, from believing the Earth was flat, to the scientific understanding that it spins on its axis and has gravitational pull, to being part of just one of many solar systems. In terms of scale, humans are too small to viscerally comprehend our planet’s magnitude and the dynamics of its interconnected physical systems. We therefore break the concepts down into smaller parts, collect data and physical specimens of all kinds, and invent instruments to measure and track physical phenomena like earthquakes, tornados, and hurricanes. However, we still cannot grasp the “big picture” of planet Earth unless we read, look at photos, and finally… use our imagination to construct it!

For Digital’2010, ASCI invites artists and scientists to submit digital prints that reflect their perceptions of our planet. Are these perceptions changing as we learn more about Earth from explorers, scientists, and artists? What is the relationship between all living things and planet Earth? What images are evoked by calling it the blue planet or the peaceful planet or the changing planet?  What is the human impact on the whole planet? What is our concern for its future? Continue reading ‘Open Call: DIGITAL’2010: PLANET EARTH’ »

Review of Lars Becker-Larsen’s The Moving Earth

by Amy Ione

Lars Becker-Larsen’s production of The Moving Earth offers a splendid chronicle of the scientific shift brought about through studies of planetary motion during the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century. The name of the film refers to the work establishing that Earth is a moving planet and the broadly based content tells the story of this discovery. Overall, the narrative highlights the controversy between geocentric and heliocentric perspectives that was a part of those debates; we learn of how the key thinkers in Renaissance Europe who studied the celestial framework developed the ideas that ultimately moved science away from the Church’s doctrine that the earth was the immoveable center of the universe. Continue reading ‘Review of Lars Becker-Larsen’s The Moving Earth’ »

New Leonardo Reviews: Posted | June 2010

A Body Worth Defending: Immunity, Biopolitics, and the Apotheosis of the Modern Body <http://www.leonardo.info/reviews/june2010/black_cohen.php>
by Ed Cohen
Reviewed by C.F. Black

Continue reading ‘New Leonardo Reviews: Posted | June 2010’ »

Ann: Leonardo Reviews Quarterly 1.01 | June 2010

Now online here

Leonardo Reviews is the work of an international panel of scholars and professionals invited from a wide range of disciplines to review books, exhibitions, CD-ROMs, Web sites, and conferences. Collectively they represent an intellectual commitment to engaging with the emergent debates and manifestations that are the consequences of the convergence of the arts,
science and technology.

Leonardo Reviews publishes all reviews received from the panel monthly at www.leonardo.info. In addition, four times a year a selection of reviews is printed in Leonardo and now in this first issue of Leonardo Reviews Quarterly will be publishing an even larger selection as a PDF together with introductory material and overviews essays.

Now online here

Visual Illusion Sampling

Scientific American has a fun slide show and some related links here.

Leonardo Reviews Posted May 2010

Leonardo Reviews (ISSN: 1559-0429) is pleased to announce the May 2010 postings at: http://leonardo.info/ldr.html

Continue reading ‘Leonardo Reviews Posted May 2010’ »

Ann: Illuminating the Science: Art and Climate Change

Thursday, April 22 at 3pm + 6:30 pm
Martin E. Segal Theatre, Graduate Center, CUNY
365 Fifth Ave at 34th Street, New York City
Free! First come, first served
http://web.gc.cuny.edu/MESTC/events/s10/illuminating-science.html

Continue reading ‘Ann: Illuminating the Science: Art and Climate Change’ »

Catastrophic Art

Philadelphia artists enlist the help of a mathematician to convey the idea that sometimes, all it takes is one small change for an elaborate biological system to crash.